The questions

The research programme

How public policy, institutions and markets shape resilience, food security, sustainability and digital rights in Africa.

Five areas

Research areas

The agenda is organised around five interlocking areas. Each asks a distinctive question about policy, food systems or digital life, and each is grounded in empirical work — from household survey evidence in East and West Africa to cross-national policy comparison.

Agricultural policy implementation

Agricultural policy in Africa is rarely short on ambition; the difficulty lies in delivery. This line of work examines how political commitment, institutional coordination and implementation capacity influence agricultural policy outcomes — why some policy instruments are adopted and enforced while others stall between announcement and practice, and what that gap means for the households the policy was meant to reach.

It treats implementation as an empirical question rather than an afterthought of design: mapping the institutions responsible, tracing where authority and resources actually flow, and assessing whether stated policy goals translate into measurable outcomes on farms and in markets.

Selected evidence

Resilience and disruption

How agricultural systems, enterprises and institutions anticipate, absorb and respond to disruption. Resilience here is not a slogan but a measurable property of a food system: whether actors can prepare for shocks, maintain function while they hit, and reorganise afterwards without lasting damage to livelihoods.

The Kenyan case is the current focus — asking which counties, value chains and institutional arrangements are getting resilience policy right, and what distinguishes them from peers facing similar climatic and economic pressures. The question matters because resilience has become a central objective of agricultural policy across the region, with uneven evidence on what actually builds it.

Selected evidence

Try the headline result interactively ↓

Food security and livelihoods

How policy, livelihoods and market conditions influence food access, dietary outcomes and social sustainability. This work moves food security beyond national supply statistics to the household level, where availability, access, utilisation and stability are actually experienced — and where gendered livelihoods shape who eats what, and when.

Empirical studies in this area have examined the food choice and diet quality of women in fishing households in Tanzania; the coping strategies and food-insecurity experiences of female-headed agricultural households in Liberia; and, comparatively, how national policies across the world aim to improve micronutrient intake through school meals. Together they connect dietary outcomes to the market and policy conditions that households operate within.

Trade, markets and development

How trade policy and market conditions translate into agricultural growth and food outcomes. This is the oldest strand of the agenda: the question of whether and how trade liberalization contributes to agricultural growth in Kenya, examined with econometric evidence on short- and long-run relationships.

It remains the analytical backbone of the wider programme. Market conditions recur in every other area — they shape the incomes that households earn, the prices they face, and the incentives that policy implementation ultimately works through. Understanding the trade-growth link is therefore a precondition for understanding everything downstream of it.

Selected evidence

Digital policy, rights and society

The newest area asks what happens when the same policy questions move online. Technology-facilitated gender-based violence (TFGBV) is a pervasive problem in Kenyan universities, yet the curricula that train the journalists who will report on it — and the lawyers who will litigate it — rarely address it. This line of work examines that gap empirically: how law and journalism programmes currently integrate TFGBV, what students experience and need, and which institutional responses actually work.

As lead researcher and curriculum consultant for the Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet), he directed the national study published as Exploring TFGBV Integration in Journalism and Law School Curricula: A Kenyan Perspective (KICTANet Report No. 34, 2025) — combining document review, a digital survey and key informant interviews, and proposing a skills-training framework for educators and policy recommendations for updating university syllabi. Related work examines digital financial inclusion and financial health among Kenyan women, and conference papers have explored countering political disinformation through AI-based learning platforms and youth social-media literacy.

Selected evidence
Field test · current working paper

The buffering pattern, in your hands

My current working paper asks whether institutional support changes what disruption does to the social side of a food enterprise. The chart below is that result, drawn from the fitted model itself. Move the support score and watch the slope.

Conditional association between disruption breadth and social sustainability contributions Lines show the model-implied association between disruption breadth and social sustainability contributions at institutional support scores 1 to 4. The line flattens as the score rises.
Model-implied associations (OLS, HC3 robust standard errors, n = 79 Kenyan agri-food enterprises). Lines pass through the sample means (disruption breadth 1.92, contributions 3.64), covariates at their means. Shading is the 95% confidence band for the selected slope. Scores 0 (one enterprise) and 5 (none) are not plotted, as in the paper’s Figure 2. Associations, not causal effects.

Institutional support score

Dimensions of the support experience described, out of five

Slope at score 1B = −0.623

95% CI −0.802 to −0.445 · 19 enterprises at this score

Where enterprises described only one dimension of the support experience, each additional type of disruption is associated with markedly lower social sustainability contributions.

The interaction behind the chart: each additional described dimension is associated with a 0.33-point increase in the disruption slope (B = 0.329, p < .001). The score counts characteristics of the support experience that enterprises described, including unfavourable assessments and accounts of non-receipt. A higher score means more dimensions documented, not more support received.

How the work is done

Methodological approach

The research is methodologically plural by design: policy questions, not methods, lead. Quantitative, qualitative, econometric and policy-oriented techniques are combined as each question requires.

Quantitative analysis

Household-level measurement of food choice, diet quality and food-insecurity experiences, and cross-country quantitative comparison — including a global cross-sectional study of national school-meal policies, and survey-based methods such as propensity-score matching on Kenya’s Financial Access Survey.

Qualitative and field evidence

Attention to how people describe and manage their circumstances: coping strategies, lived experiences of food insecurity, key informant interviews and document review — including national learner-assessment fieldwork with the Kenya National Examinations Council.

Econometric methods

Time-series and econometric analysis of policy-growth linkages, most prominently the estimation of short- and long-run relationships between trade liberalization and agricultural growth in Kenya.

Policy-oriented research

Policy mapping, institutional analysis and comparative policy review — tracing commitments from national strategy documents to implementation on the ground, and assessing which arrangements deliver outcomes.

Current work and tools

The programme is currently anchored by doctoral research in Public Policy at the University of Nairobi — supported by a PASGR & Carnegie Corporation of New York scholarship — alongside part-time lecturing in the School of Economics at the University of Eldoret, research and policy analysis with ResearchCannon, and peer review for Cogent Economics & Finance. Quantitative work is carried out in STATA, SPSS and R.

Where the evidence comes from

Four geographies, one question

Household evidence from East and West Africa, tested against a global policy sample — so that findings travel further than a single case.

Kenya

0.51° N · 35.27° E

Home base and core case — trade and growth, policy implementation, resilience in agriculture, digital finance, and online safety in universities.

Tanzania

6.79° S · 39.21° E

Food choice and diet quality among women in fishing households, from lake and coastal communities.

Liberia

6.30° N · 10.80° W

Coping strategies and food-insecurity experiences of female-headed agricultural households.

Global

Every meridian

Cross-national comparison of national policies for improving micronutrient intake in school meals.

Next chapter — 03 The record Every study behind these five areas — linked to its version of record.